Saturday, 19 December 2009

Draft control and regulation motion for Spring conference

This is the motion for Federal Spring conference. I am hoping to gather 50 signatures of conference reps in order to demonstrate wide support for the policy. Please get in touch if you wish to lend your support.


Conference notes:

A) The continuing failure of a prohibitionist policy on psychoactive drugs to reduce consumption of these drugs in the UK and to tackle the many social, economic and health consequences of their use.

B) Problem drug users commit over half of all acquisitive crimes and account for around 95% of street prostitution

C) The destabilising influence the drugs trade is having internationally especially in Latin America, West Africa, and Afghanistan, where up to 50% of Taliban income is from the opium trade.

D) A comprehensive survey by the WHO has demonstrated that there is no association between more stringent prohibition and lower levels of drug use. Progressive policies in Portugal and Switzerland have achieved excellent results and have broad public support.


Conference believes:

1) We have a moral duty to ensure that drug addicts do not harm themselves or others by funding their drug use through prostitution, acquisitive crime or drug dealing.

2) An end to prohibition would increase respect for and co-operation with our police forces, remove drug dealing as an attractive career path for our youth, remove a major driver of gang violence, reduce prison overcrowding and free up tens of thousands of police for other priorities.

3) Bringing drugs under strict regulatory control would create many thousands of jobs in agriculture, pharmaceuticals, manufacturing and retail.

4) The treasury would benefit from billions of pounds in saved criminal justice costs, tax income from pharmacy sales and income tax coming in from the newly created licit jobs. The population would benefit directly from reduced costs of crime and lowered insurance premiums.

5) Deaths, injuries and illness brought about by overdose, contaminants, blood-borne infection, general ignorance of safe use practices and ignorance of the mental health implications of drug use would be reduced.


Conference therefore calls for:

a) An impact assessment of current drugs policy to be carried out by government as a matter of urgency.

b) Strict regulation and control of the manufacture, distribution and sale of drugs to be a key policy in the fight against acquisitive and organised crime, prostitution, the Taliban, mental and physical ill health, poverty, child neglect, unemployment and delinquency.

c) Supervised consumption of prescribed or low-cost drugs to be available to drugs users who might otherwise deal drugs, commit acquisitive crime or enter sex work.

d) The new system to include a licensing scheme that would ensure education on each specific drug is administered before an individual is licensed to purchase it at a licensed pharmacist or clinic, and to ensure under 18s would not be able to purchase drugs, alcohol or tobacco in shops.

e) Close monitoring of patterns of use and the impacts of reform on public and societal health to be carried out while maintaining individual's rights for their drug use history to be completely confidential.

f) The opening of dialogue with our neighbours and allies to facilitate Britain gaining wide support from the international community for when we responsibly take the lead in this course of action.

1 comment:

  1. Traditionally, in classical China, opium was an Imperial monopoly, it was purchased by the old and sick
    As soon at it was criminalised, creating black market opportunities, that relationship changed, ending up in the situation we've got today

    ReplyDelete